# TFileDependencyAction is not loaded

**URL:** https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/tfiledependencyaction-is-not-loaded/1998
**Category:** Discussion
**Created:** [June 14, 2012, 11:48am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/tfiledependencyaction-is-not-loaded/1998 "2012-06-14T11:48:51Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![deleted\_user](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/user_avatar/www.finalbuilder.com/deleted_user/32/937_2.png) [@deleted\_user](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/deleted_user)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2012, 11:48am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/tfiledependencyaction-is-not-loaded/1998/1 "2012-06-14T11:48:51Z")

</div>

I have started using FinalBuilder 7 with an existing project. After an update to version 7.0.0.1899 and a new licence key the following warning appeared:

WARNING Action class : "TFileDependencyAction" is not loaded and is referenced by this project, if you save this project the missing actions will be deleted from the project.

In --\>Tools --\>Package Manager no TFileDependencyAction was found and there is no .bpl file that contains such a thing.

Who knows what to do?

Turan Fettahoglu, Munich, Germany

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cwollenhaupt](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/user_avatar/www.finalbuilder.com/cwollenhaupt/32/70_2.png) [@cwollenhaupt](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/cwollenhaupt)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2012, 1:31am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/tfiledependencyaction-is-not-loaded/1998/2 "2012-06-14T01:31:57Z")

</div>

An update on this issue… It appears that FinalBuilder adds the following section to the FinalBuilder7.INI when you register a standard license:   
  
 [code][DisabledPackages]FBNTServices.bpl=FBPDF.bpl=FBProfessional.bpl=FBSQLServer.bpl=FBwmi.bpl=[/code]   
  
 After purchasing an update to the professional edition, entering a pro license does not remove those entries. As a result, any of the pro actions remain unavailable. Deleting the section fixes the problem. This looks like a bug to me.
