# Ignore Failure in 'Run Actions List' action is disabled

**URL:** https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/ignore-failure-in-run-actions-list-action-is-disabled/1597
**Category:** Discussion
**Created:** [September 15, 2010, 9:57am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/ignore-failure-in-run-actions-list-action-is-disabled/1597 "2010-09-15T09:57:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![deleted\_user](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/user_avatar/www.finalbuilder.com/deleted_user/32/937_2.png) [@deleted\_user](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/deleted_user)
#### Post date: [September 15, 2010, 9:57am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/ignore-failure-in-run-actions-list-action-is-disabled/1597/1 "2010-09-15T09:57:03Z")

</div>

&nbsp;I'm checking FinalBuilder7 &nbsp;for our company now. We have some code in C++ and some code in Java. Since FinalBuilder does not supports Java technologies, except running javac compiler and ant files, I've build action list that update code from SVN, builds it with Maven2, deploys to Tomcat web server and runs tests. I run it for each of Java modules with 'Run Actions List' action. Some modules is optional and my boss wants the build to continue, even if actions list failed on it. I see that in difference to most actions, in 'Run Actions List', 'Ignore Failure' checkbox is disabled. Can I enable it in some way. If I can't, is try..catch solution will work on 'Run Actions List' if one of list actions is failed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Vincent](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/user_avatar/www.finalbuilder.com/vincent/32/938_2.png) [@Vincent](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/Vincent)
#### Post date: [November 16, 2010, 1:48am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/ignore-failure-in-run-actions-list-action-is-disabled/1597/2 "2010-11-16T01:48:15Z")

</div>

Hi   
  
 Not sure why this wasn’t responded to. The ignore failure option is not available on the run actionlist action because of a design issue that makes it not currently possible. Putting a try/catch around it is the way to go.
