# Cloning configurations with configuration specific repositories

**URL:** https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/cloning-configurations-with-configuration-specific-repositories/6047
**Category:** Bugs
**Created:** [July 6, 2016, 11:14am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/cloning-configurations-with-configuration-specific-repositories/6047 "2016-07-06T11:14:24Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![remko.seelig](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/5f9b8f/32.png) [@remko.seelig](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/remko.seelig)
#### Post date: [July 6, 2016, 11:14am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/cloning-configurations-with-configuration-specific-repositories/6047/1 "2016-07-06T11:14:24Z")

</div>

Hi, I just ran in a situation that appears to be a bug (low severity I guess):  
  
When cloning a configuration that has a configuration specific repository, the&nbsp;repository is selected for the cloned project but not visible. However, when running builds it’s reported in the changeset. I had to promote the repository to global or project and it then became visible and selected in the second&nbsp;tab (repository) and I was able to deselect&nbsp;it.  
  
Can’t think of a way this would harm, but just wanted to report it anyway. Either the repository should be deselected (but would create a non-working clone) or it may be selected in the clone but the associated repositories that are scoped as configuration should then&nbsp;be promoted to either project or global, depending on the target project for the clone. Maybe the user should be prompted on beforehand.  
  
Kind regards,  
Remko Seelig

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sparky](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/user_avatar/www.finalbuilder.com/sparky/32/10_2.png) [@Sparky](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/u/Sparky)
#### Post date: [July 7, 2016, 8:15am UTC](https://www.finalbuilder.com/forums/t/cloning-configurations-with-configuration-specific-repositories/6047/2 "2016-07-07T08:15:10Z")

</div>

Hi Remko,  
  
Thank you for reporting this. We have reproduced the issue (due to a conflict with another thread) and have implemented a fix for next version.&nbsp;
